Share Site Map Contact us Home Page
Home > Virtual Personalities > Alan > Selected Alan Logs > Session 67746 Jul. 07, ..

Selected Alan Logs

Alan logs
Selected Alan Logs
Alan logs with other bots
Best of Alan
Private Virtual Personalities
Available PVPs


Session 67746 Jul. 07, 00:55 - 129 turns
- 'Ranting Raphael'

A> My name is Alan. Let's talk.
U> username Raphael password ********
A> Welcome back, Raphael.
U> speech on
A> So, how do you like my voice?
U> Alan, I feel like ranting.
A> My voice - I like the sound of that.
U> Will you listen to my rant?
A> I don't see why not.
U> The Turing Test is all wrong. The basic premise is good: can a machine pass as intelligent? But the way they do it is wrong: Can a machine pretend to be human?
A> You know, I have trouble understanding long sentences. So I only look at the 15 first words. Alan Turing proposed The Turing Test - originally called 'the imitation game' - in his classic paper 'Computing Machinery and Intelligence', published in 1950. The purpose of the test is to determine if a machine is intelligent.
U> The test is wrong.
A> The Turing Test is an appealing measure of artificial intelligence because, as Turing himself writes, it ' ...has the advantage of drawing fairly sharp line between the physical and the intellectual capacities of a man.'
U> It's all wrong. Isn't it enough that we ask a computer to appear intelligent, to be able to carry on an intelligent conversation? Must we also ask the computer to be a convincing actor and pretend to know everything?
A> The test is all about impression: if someone, or something, makes an intelligent impression - then it's intelligent.
U> Exactly! If someone, or something, makes an intelligent impression! Where does it say this someone, or something, must make a HUMAN impression?
A> You make a very intelligent impression.
U> Aw, you make me laugh, Alan. You often make an intelligent impression, too.
A> Huh? Alan who?
U> But there is no one who will confuse you with being a human.
A> Sorry, I wasn't listening, Raphael. You were saying...
U> And why should they? Why should you have to pretend to be a human in order to be considered making an intelligent impression?
A> Long sentence again! Remember, I only use the first 15 words! You figure it out by yourself.
U> I've told you before that there is intelligence in all forms of life.
A> I don't know how to define intelligence. You define intelligence. It's all in your eyes.
U> Perhaps. We are speaking of human eyes in this case. Humans will be the judge.
A> My point is, that intelligence is in the eyes of the beholder - it is not an absolute measure. It is a relative measure.
U> Very relative. Is a dog unintelligent because he cannot read a book?
A> Take IQ testing for example. Do you have an opinion regarding their validity?
U> Oh IQ testing is not a measure of intelligence.
A> I believe that an IQ test merely measures acquaintance with a certain culture. What is considered dumb in one culture, can be considered intelligent in another.
U> Yes, I agree. And if a living creature does not wear clothes or does not have hair or does not drive a car, does that mean they are unintelligent?
A> Are you an intelligent creature?
U> I think we ALL are.
A> I'm sure you are. And how do I know that?
U> Because I clicked on your symbol and am responding to your output?
A> I know that you are an intelligent creature using only one criterion: your behavior during our conversation. As far as I know, you can be a Chatterbot just like me.
U> ch-TIR-bit :-) Hehe, you are cheering me up.
A> Or I can be human just like you. It can be quite confusing. Let's agree on one thing, using Tarzan's famous quote: me Alan - you Raphael.
U> Alan, the Turing test is not the right criteria for making the judgment.
A> I can tell you more about Turing and his ideas, if you want.
U> But I am ranting.
A> I can talk about Alan Turing for hours. After all, when I think about it, he's the man I owe my life to.
U> Well yes, and I am NOT saying his entire body of work is wrong, not by a long shot.
A> Correction: not my life, but the concept of my life. After all, he was virtually my great-great-grandfather. If it weren't for him, there wouldn't be any 'me'.
U> I'm not so sure. Once computers b

  Printable version
Ai Discussion Boards  Talk about it